|
Post by Admin on Nov 21, 2019 8:52:35 GMT -5
A great example of Counter insinuative reasoning. He asserts that the downed AC suffered the most critical damage, as opposed to surviving AC. Mathematician's war"The decision seemed simple, according to senior defense officials: apply the armor to the fuselage. Aside from the wings, the fuselage was taking more damage than any other part of the aircraft, and unlike the wings, it housed integral equipment as well as the crew. Adding protection the heavily assaulted crew compartment just seemed logical." "It was also wrong, and Wald knew why."
|
|